Foundation and historical setting

St Christopher’s Hospice opened in Sydenham, south London, in 1967 under the leadership of Cicely Saunders. Its first patient arrived on 13 July; Princess Alexandra formally opened the institution on 24 July. These dates distinguish the beginning of clinical work from the ceremonial opening. St Christopher’s became a defining institution of the modern hospice movement through its combination of clinical care, research and teaching.

Care for dying people had a much longer history, including earlier hospices and religious nursing foundations. St Christopher’s therefore should not be described as the first institution ever to shelter or care for the dying. Its distinctive programme joined compassionate nursing to systematic investigation and the dissemination of knowledge. The hospice’s retrospective history situates that programme within a hospital culture increasingly oriented towards treatment and cure, where approaching death could be understood as professional failure. This institutional account is valuable evidence of how St Christopher’s explains its own purpose. Source: St Christopher’s institutional history.

Making an institution

The hospice emerged through years of planning, fundraising and building. Its oral-history exhibition records that the Sydenham site was selected in 1963 partly because transport connections would help relatives and friends visit. Construction began in spring 1965. These details show that access and relationships were practical considerations in the institution’s design, alongside the requirements of inpatient care.

The exhibition also recalls David Tasma, a patient whom Saunders met in 1948. His bequest of £500 and a window dedicated to him became important elements of the hospice’s founding narrative. Such recollections connect institutional history to particular encounters between patients and caregivers. They also require careful interpretation: a commemorative exhibition preserves selected memories rather than a complete account of every participant’s experience. Saunders’ leadership was central, but buildings, wards and services depended on supporters and staff whose collective work made the project possible. Source: The voices that shaped us.

The original clinical and educational programme

Saunders’ 1967 account of St Christopher’s provides evidence of the programme as it was articulated at the time. It described gaps in research and teaching concerning people dying of cancer and those needing skilled relief during other prolonged illnesses. The institution was intended to bring several disciplines into this work and to involve relatives in care.

Continuity beyond the inpatient ward was part of the original ambition. Saunders discussed patients returning home and plans for a domiciliary service. The paper also presented the hospice as a religious foundation with an open character. This combination of spiritual commitments, clinical investigation and multidisciplinary practice is essential to understanding its historical identity. The founding statement establishes intentions; it does not, by itself, demonstrate that every patient experienced those intentions in the same way. Reading it alongside institutional records and personal recollections helps separate a programme’s aspirations from its implementation. Source: Saunders’ founding-year account.

Suffering, care and medical responsibility

Saunders brought experience as a nurse, medical social worker and physician to the hospice project. This background helps explain the breadth of its understanding of care. Her response to terminal illness challenged the suggestion that professional responsibility ended when a disease could no longer be cured. Attention to symptoms, relationships and the experience of dying remained meaningful work.

The hospice’s account of its founder emphasises the integration of pain and symptom control with compassionate care, teaching and clinical research. Historically, this integration helped make care of dying people a subject for organised clinical learning rather than an activity understood only through personal kindness. It also raises a continuing interpretive question: how can scientific assessment acknowledge suffering that is expressed through individual experiences and family circumstances? This history describes the development of a clinical outlook; it does not establish historical treatments as suitable instructions for present-day patients. Source: St Christopher’s account of Saunders.

Influence and the limits of a founding narrative

St Christopher’s extended its work into home care in 1969. This development reinforced the idea that hospice care could reach beyond a dedicated building. Its educational purpose also made the institution a place from which approaches to care could circulate.

The description of St Christopher’s as a pioneering modern hospice is most useful when its meaning remains specific: the integration of care, investigation and teaching. Treating that label as the beginning of all compassionate end-of-life care would obscure earlier institutions and informal caregiving. Its legacy belongs within the broader history of hospice and palliative care, where institutional innovation and older traditions of attending to dying people can be considered together. Source: Institutional chronology.

Sources